I read today that actor Wesley Snipes recieved a 3-year jail sentence in relation to his legal tax troubles. I’m not going to argue whether or not I think he deserved to get that sentence or not. That was for the judge to decide. I thought that the most interesting part of the story was contained in the statement that Mr. Snipes read where he called himself “well-intentioned, but miseducated” in matters of finance.
I believe Mr. Snipes to be in the majority on this one. How many of us have made errors in judgement as it relates to financial matters?
……… Sorry for the delay in continuing my thoughts, I was too busy raising my hand, so I couldn’t type…
Where Mr. Snipes and I differ, however, is in the fact that he presumably has access to advisors and counsel that little-ole me doesn’t. For someone who earned millions of dollars over the past few years, to have not sought to use a fraction of that money to seek the wise counsel of some sort of financial advisor or accountant, is just silly to me. Granted, I am not wise about the stress, strain, hardships or responsibility that one faces when earning that level of money. But what I do know is that the instant I am making enough money that my taxes need no longer be handled by TurboTax’s software program because I am needing necessary creative deductions to help protect my wealth, is the instant that I will be finding a trustworthy tax accountant. What’s my alternative? Plead ignorance to the financial ways of the world, continue to live life with my head in the sand, get caught, and get sent to jail for 3 years where I can’t practice the livelihood that provided me the money in the first place? That’s one way to not give any money to Uncle Sam… don’t earn any to have to pay taxes on!
For these and other posts, as well as the books in the 26 Things to teach Your Parents series, visit http://www.26thingstoteach.com/
Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Monday, April 28, 2008
Thinking of tomorrow, Today...
Yet another article in the paper about the misuse of one of the government credit card programs by an employee. I was getting ready to type in that I don’t understand why it is that an employee would just abuse the government credit card by purchasing frivolous things that clearly don’t have anything to do with their job or responsibility. But is it really that different than one’s personal credit card? You whip out your credit card and make impulsive purchases that you clearly don’t really need, and can’t afford to pay for at the end of the billing month. Most people don’t think about the financial repercussions of their purchase until their bill comes in the mail. Even then, they don’t really have to think about it all that hard, because they have the option of making the minimum payment, which is much more affordable. They can just make that payment, file the bill away as being “paid”, charge up more items, and then start the whole cycle over again when the bill comes in the mail. It’s a great game of avoidance mixed with hide and seek. I don’t think those government employees thought that they’d get caught. I think they thought that their credit card bill was one of thousands, and they figured that they’d worry about it when the bill came at the end of the month.
Too bad credit card companies don’t send you daily statements by text-message or email that would remind you of where you stand today. If more people thought of their tomorrows… today… how different would their worlds be?
For these and other blog posts, as well as info on the 26 Things to Teach Your Parents book series, visit www.26thingstoteach.com
Too bad credit card companies don’t send you daily statements by text-message or email that would remind you of where you stand today. If more people thought of their tomorrows… today… how different would their worlds be?
For these and other blog posts, as well as info on the 26 Things to Teach Your Parents book series, visit www.26thingstoteach.com
Monday, April 14, 2008
You're going to do what?
So, I have a friend who told me the other day that she has decided that she is going to do whatever it takes to move into a million dollar home within the next year and a half. She lives in the DC area, and so that’s not hard to have happen. So far, so good… if that’s her goal and wish, then fine. What I wasn’t prepared for though was her plan for reaching that goal. See, she bought a house a few years ago and rehabbed it.. a magnificent rehab I must say. But now that she has decided that she needs a bigger house with a bigger yard, she is planning on dumping that house. I know that this story is not a unique one, and as a real estate agent, I certainly hear this type of story all the time. The problem for me is HOW she’s going to dump that house. You see, in this market, there are tons of sellers who are dumping their houses by slashing the sales prices (largely because they can because of all of the equity that they can afford to walk away from in order to have the sale go through). This presents a problem for people like my friend, because those types of sellers who live near her house have now caused the appraised value of her house to decrease. And that means that she is now in a situation where she owes more on her house than her house is worth… she is “upside down”. But she’s not going to let that stand in her way of getting her dream house. Her solution? To short-sale the house in order to be released from that mortgage obligation, and then be free (theoretically) to buy the million-dollar home that she really wants. She asked my opinion, and I told her that I couldn’t believe that she was going to risk possibly damaging her credit with the short-sale in order to buy a house that was even more expensive. She said that she spoke to a representative at her current mortgage company, who assured her that since they have so many short-sales to deal with already, they were not going to go after her for the difference, and that she’d “be fine”.
So, for those who don’t really know what short-sales are, here ya go: Say you owe $500,000 on your house, but the house is now only worth $450,000, and a buyer offers you $440,000 for your house. Take $500,000 and subtract $440,000, and that difference of $60,000 is what the mortgage company is left holding, unless they can get the money from you.
So, nevermind my friend and her plans. What I want to know is, if there are mortgage companies out there telling people that they’re not going to go after you for that $60,000, and therefore you won’t have to pay it… then who is going to pay? Will it be future potential borrowers who will have to jump through hoops and pay in increased fees and rates? Or will it also be me, the day I decide to get a new mortgage?
For these and other blog posts, as well as info on the 26 Things to Teach Your Parents book series, visit www.26thingstoteach.com
So, for those who don’t really know what short-sales are, here ya go: Say you owe $500,000 on your house, but the house is now only worth $450,000, and a buyer offers you $440,000 for your house. Take $500,000 and subtract $440,000, and that difference of $60,000 is what the mortgage company is left holding, unless they can get the money from you.
So, nevermind my friend and her plans. What I want to know is, if there are mortgage companies out there telling people that they’re not going to go after you for that $60,000, and therefore you won’t have to pay it… then who is going to pay? Will it be future potential borrowers who will have to jump through hoops and pay in increased fees and rates? Or will it also be me, the day I decide to get a new mortgage?
For these and other blog posts, as well as info on the 26 Things to Teach Your Parents book series, visit www.26thingstoteach.com
Wednesday, April 2, 2008
3rd graders plot attack against teacher?
At first I thought it was an April Fool’s joke. How could it be that 3rd graders in Georgia actually plotted to attack their elementary school teacher? When I clicked on the link for the story, the first thing that I noticed was the photo of the bag of items that they were planning on using. Duct tape, handcuffs, a broken steak knife, a paperweight, and other items. And listen to this: apparently they were organized enough to have assigned tasks to one another to help facilitate their goal. One of them was to cover the windows (so no one could witness it?), and another had cleanup detail afterwards. How were the industrious 3rd graders (I can’t believe I just typed that in…) going to do whatever it was that they were thinking of doing? By apparently knocking her unconscious with the paperweight, handcuffing her, taping her up and then stabbing her with the steak knife. What did the teacher do to deserve her intended fate? She “scolded one of them for standing on a chair”. I would love to know what is going on in the world of that 9 year old girl who brought the steak knife to school, and the 10 year old girl who brought in the paperweight. You see, even 3rd graders are watching, listening and comprehending much more than what adults give them credit for. Do we really think they can’t handle financial education?
Sunday, March 30, 2008
When is enough ENOUGH?
Another trusted official seemingly walked down an unsavory path and is now paying the price today for their actions. Today, the HUD Secretary Jackson resigned because of his alleged participation in a scandal that involved money. I don’t pretend to know all of the details of the situation, or what is true and what is not. This story is not unlike many of the other stories that have surfaced in recent years with the same theme. It’s a story of people not being satisfied with what they have, and instead of working within the constraints of the law and moral ethics, make the decision to bypass those things in an attempt to gain or profit (at times, at someone else’s expense). A list containing the names of those people is too long to write down here. What I’d be more interested in learning about is where that whole mentality comes from, and why some folks think that it’s okay to circumvent the laws that the rest of us rely on to guide our behavior?
What message are we sending to our young people by participating in such activities? It’s the same thing as trying to tell your child not to smoke as you yourself are taking a puff of a cigarette. Is it really effective to in a sense tell your child “do as I say, not as I do”? According to Mr. Jackson’s biography on the HUD website, he and his wife have two grown daughters. It is my hope that the next generation of potential leaders that are the offspring of these fallen leaders will not do as they have seen done.
What message are we sending to our young people by participating in such activities? It’s the same thing as trying to tell your child not to smoke as you yourself are taking a puff of a cigarette. Is it really effective to in a sense tell your child “do as I say, not as I do”? According to Mr. Jackson’s biography on the HUD website, he and his wife have two grown daughters. It is my hope that the next generation of potential leaders that are the offspring of these fallen leaders will not do as they have seen done.
Wednesday, March 26, 2008
It's Just a Game, Right?

Okay, so I saw an advertisement on television for a Monopoly game by Parker Brothers (an imprint of Hasbro). Let me just say from the start that it’s not a game that will I ever play, nor would I want my son to play it. Let me tell you why.
It’s the Electronic Banking edition apparently. Feel free to go to their website at and see it for http://www.hasbro.com/games/kid-games/monopoly/default.cfm?page=Products/Detail&product_id=19783 yourself. You can click on the game and get a virtual sample of what it will be like to play the game. Now I absolutely love Monopoly, and always have since I first played as a child. It is a game that I have played with my son many times. I would just never buy the electronic banking version. Apparently, each player starts the game with a debit card that is loaded with $15 million! Yes, I wrote 15 million, there is no error. There are so many things that I think are wrong with the messages that the game is putting out, that I don’t know if I can list them all here. How realistic is it to start with $15 million dollars? And who in their right mind would want it to be loaded and spend freely on a debit card? Is that all of the money that you have, or do you have a savings or investment account somewhere? OK, let me move on from the issue of the money… the tokens that you select from at the start. Your choices are a plasma tv, a box of Altoids, a space shuttle, a Segway, a purse with a dog in it (would my little girl be getting encouraged to be Paris Hilton for the duration of the game?), and thank goodness for those of us that were happy being the shoe or thimble in the old version… there is a baseball cap in this version.
Moving right along with the actual game: I can take my plasma tv, roll the dice and move down the lane… landing on Gateway Arch, St. Louis which will cost me $1 million dollars should I choose to buy it. OK, no problem, because I’ve got 14 more where that came from, and I’m feeling lucky. My opponent moves, and then it’s my turn again. A roll of the dice lands me on Community Chest where I am told that I am the runner-up on a reality tv show (and have therefore won $100,000). On my next turn, I land on Disney World Orlando, and have to pay rent of $200,000. 200K for what? Would that be for my resort timeshare there, and if so, how long does that get me? As the adult, I would assume it’s the rent for the entire place, but I’m not sure my child would know. A roll of the dice brings me to a Chance space, where I am ordered to donate $150,000 for disaster relief. Not bad I suppose since I have $14 million left… I suppose the message of being philanthropic is not lost here. I have a problem with cards that say “Win big at the casinos in Atlantic city… win $1 M”. I have no idea how much it will cost to get out of jail, can only image how much money could sit in “free parking” waiting to be won, and hate to guess how much those blue properties at the end of the board will cost that were always expensive (you know, Park Place and Boardwalk). What I do know is that each time the player passes “go”, they collect a whopping $2 million for successfully dodging all of the financial whoppers that are on the player’s path.
The game is said to be for ages 8 and up. Hmmm. It’s just a game though, right?
It’s the Electronic Banking edition apparently. Feel free to go to their website at and see it for http://www.hasbro.com/games/kid-games/monopoly/default.cfm?page=Products/Detail&product_id=19783 yourself. You can click on the game and get a virtual sample of what it will be like to play the game. Now I absolutely love Monopoly, and always have since I first played as a child. It is a game that I have played with my son many times. I would just never buy the electronic banking version. Apparently, each player starts the game with a debit card that is loaded with $15 million! Yes, I wrote 15 million, there is no error. There are so many things that I think are wrong with the messages that the game is putting out, that I don’t know if I can list them all here. How realistic is it to start with $15 million dollars? And who in their right mind would want it to be loaded and spend freely on a debit card? Is that all of the money that you have, or do you have a savings or investment account somewhere? OK, let me move on from the issue of the money… the tokens that you select from at the start. Your choices are a plasma tv, a box of Altoids, a space shuttle, a Segway, a purse with a dog in it (would my little girl be getting encouraged to be Paris Hilton for the duration of the game?), and thank goodness for those of us that were happy being the shoe or thimble in the old version… there is a baseball cap in this version.
Moving right along with the actual game: I can take my plasma tv, roll the dice and move down the lane… landing on Gateway Arch, St. Louis which will cost me $1 million dollars should I choose to buy it. OK, no problem, because I’ve got 14 more where that came from, and I’m feeling lucky. My opponent moves, and then it’s my turn again. A roll of the dice lands me on Community Chest where I am told that I am the runner-up on a reality tv show (and have therefore won $100,000). On my next turn, I land on Disney World Orlando, and have to pay rent of $200,000. 200K for what? Would that be for my resort timeshare there, and if so, how long does that get me? As the adult, I would assume it’s the rent for the entire place, but I’m not sure my child would know. A roll of the dice brings me to a Chance space, where I am ordered to donate $150,000 for disaster relief. Not bad I suppose since I have $14 million left… I suppose the message of being philanthropic is not lost here. I have a problem with cards that say “Win big at the casinos in Atlantic city… win $1 M”. I have no idea how much it will cost to get out of jail, can only image how much money could sit in “free parking” waiting to be won, and hate to guess how much those blue properties at the end of the board will cost that were always expensive (you know, Park Place and Boardwalk). What I do know is that each time the player passes “go”, they collect a whopping $2 million for successfully dodging all of the financial whoppers that are on the player’s path.
The game is said to be for ages 8 and up. Hmmm. It’s just a game though, right?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)